FCS LogoFCS LogoFCS LogoFCS Logo
  • Home
  • Services
    • Services Overview
    • Technical Training
    • Plant Engineering
    • Technology Transfer
    • Short Course Catalog
  • Industries Served
    • Power Generation
    • District Energy
    • Transmission & Distribution
    • Pulp and Paper
    • Water and Wastewater Treatment
    • Beverage
    • Heavy Industry
  • Who We Are
    • Our Team
    • Experience
    • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact us
Rendered image of a power plant control room
Control Room Operator Training
November 29, 2018
Modifying Conventional Power Plants for a Changing Industry
January 2, 2019
Show all

Part 3 of Series: Level Control and Feedwater Heater Problems

Published by Scott Hommel at December 3, 2018
Power Station at Dusk

This is the third and final blog in a three-part series about identifying issues with feedwater heaters. The series discusses why feedwater heaters are important to efficient plant operations, how health of feedwater heaters can be determined, and common level control and feedwater heater problems that occur during operation of the heaters. View the first installment here, and the second installment here.

In a power plant, one of the most common causes of tube failures in a feedwater heater is the improper control of the liquid condensate level in the shell, which also can cause operational and maintenance costs that might lead to premature replacement.  The condensate that forms in the shell of each feedwater heater is allowed to flow to the next lowest pressure heater through level control valves, an arrangement called cascading drains.  The level control valves control the drain flow to maintain optimum condensate level in each heater.  Properly controlling heater levels does two things:

  • Prevents damage to the drain cooler components
  • Maintains good heat transfer efficiency

A level control test may be performed to determine the optimum operating level for a feedwater heater by manually altering the heater level and recording the DCA and TTD responses.  Lowering the level results in increased drain temperatures and subsequently lower DCA. When the drain cooler is uncovered, there is a sudden step up in drain temperature and reduced DCA resulting from steam entering the drain cooler.  TTD is not affected by level as long as it isn’t so high that tubes other than the drain cooler tubes are covered with condensate.  Usually there is a level target on the outside of the FWH that shows design level.  That is a good starting point.

For example, if a feedwater heater’s drain cooler entrance becomes uncovered when the level drops to 5.5” and its condensing section tube coverage begins around 13”, normal level control can be adjusted to an optimum operating range between 7-9” based on actual level measurement, regardless of the “design” level.  Selecting a new optimum operating level control range includes consideration of the existing high-level dump control valve, alarm and bypass switch settings, as well as their range of adjustment and control, both prior to performing the level control test, as well as prior to establishing a new normal control range.  Each feedwater heater will have unique behavior relating to level, location of level indicators, and the DCA and TTD performance indices.

It is important for the optimum operating level to also consider the impacts of periodic changes to normal or full-power operating conditions, such as start-up and shutdown, transient operation, heater strings out-of-service, low load operation and similar conditions.  Adjustments or tuning of level control valve feedback or gain settings might also be appropriate to reflect the dynamics of the system response to a new normal operating control range.  Heater level tests should be considered whenever there are indications of level related problems with the feedwater heater, as well as if there have been significant changes made to the feedwater heater or its operation, such as tube plugging or uprates.

The following is a summary of typical feedwater heater problems in a power plant:

  • Poor Level Control
    • High level covers the condensing tubes and reduces heat transfer causing a high TTD.
    • Low level uncovers tubes and may even allow steam to blow through without condensing. If the heater has an integral drain cooler, it will have a high DCA.
  • Insufficient Venting
    • Accumulation of non-condensable gases in the heater shell reduces heat transfer.
    • Running and startup vent positions should be checked.
    • A common problem that results in inefficiency is forgetting to close the startup vent: it hurts plant efficiency but does not hurt TTD or DCA.
  • Leaking Emergency Drain Valves
    • Does not affect temperature rise, TTD or DCS, but does cause inefficiency.
  • Mechanical Damage Inside Heater
    • Desuperheater or drain cooler Baffle damage in heater shell.
    • Waterbox partition leaks.
  • Other Operational Issues
    • Heater isolation/bypass and extraction steam valves:
      • Condensate/feedwater Inlet & outlet valve should be fully open.
      • Bypass valve (when installed) should be fully closed.
      • Extraction steam line valves are fully open.

Share
Tweet
+1
Share
Pin
Scott Hommel
Scott Hommel
Scott Hommel is Vice President and Senior Project Manager at FCS. Following 10 years in the US Navy as an electrician in the Nuclear Power Program, Scott has spent the past 28 years developing procedures and designing and delivering training for the transmission & distribution and power generation industries. Contact Scott at shommel@fossilconsulting.com for more information or if you have any questions.

Related posts

February 7, 2019

FCS New Office Location


Read more
Rendered image of a power plant control room
November 29, 2018

Control Room Operator Training


Read more
B&W Industrial Plant
November 26, 2018

Part 2 of Series: Determining the Health of Feedwater Heaters


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Categories

  • Maintenance
  • Operations
  • Power Plant Fundamentals
  • Power Plant Simulation
  • Qualifications and Training
  • Safety
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • 0
    FCS New Office Location
    February 7, 2019
  • Power Plant Settling Pond Water Purification0
    Water Purity has Reached New Limits!
    January 21, 2019
  • 0
    Modifying Conventional Power Plants for a Changing Industry
    January 2, 2019

Recent Blog Posts

  • 0
    FCS New Office Location
    February 7, 2019
  • Power Plant Settling Pond Water Purification0
    Water Purity has Reached New Limits!
    January 21, 2019
  • 0
    Modifying Conventional Power Plants for a Changing Industry
    January 2, 2019

Fossil Consulting Services, Inc.

5457 Twin Knolls Road, Suite 304
Columbia, Maryland 21045
Telephone: (410) 312-6240
Email: FCS@FossilConsulting.com

White FCS Logo with shadow
© 2019 Fossil Consulting Services, Inc. All Rights Reserved.