Part 1 of Series: Why Do Plants Require Feedwater Heaters?Part 1 of Series: Why Do Plants Require Feedwater Heaters?Part 1 of Series: Why Do Plants Require Feedwater Heaters?Part 1 of Series: Why Do Plants Require Feedwater Heaters?
  • Home
  • Services
    • Services Overview
    • Technical Training
    • Plant Engineering
    • Technology Transfer
    • Short Course Catalog
  • Industries Served
    • Power Generation
    • District Energy
    • Transmission & Distribution
    • Pulp and Paper
    • Water and Wastewater Treatment
    • Beverage
    • Heavy Industry
  • Who We Are
    • Our Team
    • Experience
    • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact us
✕

Part 1 of Series: Why Do Plants Require Feedwater Heaters?

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Qualifications and Training
  • Part 1 of Series: Why Do Plants Require Feedwater Heaters?
Control Room Operator Training
November 29, 2018
Steam and Water Piping in Thermal Power Plant
Part 2 of Series: Determining the Health of Feedwater Heaters
January 2, 2019
Show all

Part 1 of Series: Why Do Plants Require Feedwater Heaters?

Published by Scott Hommel at December 3, 2018
Steam and Water Piping in Thermal Power Plant

Today’s blog is the first in a three-part series about identifying issues with feedwater heaters. Over the next few weeks, the series will discuss why feedwater heaters are important to efficient plant operations, how health of feedwater heaters can be determined, and common level control and feedwater heater problems that occur during operation of the heaters.

Feedwater heaters are components of Rankine cycle power plants that typically do not receive much attention.  They just do their thing, condensing extraction stream from the turbine and sending condensate back to the condenser, and heating the feedwater in the process.  However, ignoring the feedwater heaters means you take the risk of major efficiency losses within the plant.  By checking a few basic parameters for each heater, an operator can quickly determine the “health” of that feedwater heater.  This three-part series will explain the thermodynamic function of feedwater heaters as related to power plant heat cycle, discuss measurements to use to evaluate heater performance, and describe the basic concepts of heater level control and problems arising from improper level control and other factors.

The efficiency of fossil fuel, Rankine cycle power plants vary widely, typically from 38% to 25%.  If we assume a relatively efficient plant has 36% efficiency, meaning that for every BTU of fuel energy input to the plant, the equivalent of 0.36 BTU of electrical energy is output from the plant.  The other 64% of the fuel energy is wasted.  Figure 1 provides a rough accounting of where the energy in the fuel:

  • ~10% out the stack as heat losses
  • ~3% for plant electrical loads
  • ~36% for generator electrical output to the grid
  • ~51% discharged to the river or cooling tower from the condenser

That last one should be an eye-opener.  Over half of the energy supplied to the power plant is lost in the condenser, where that heat appears as an increase in the temperature of the circulating water flowing through the condenser tubes.  There is no way to eliminate the condenser in the Rankine cycle, and in fact it serves two important functions:

  • First, by condensing the steam exhausting from the turbine, it reduces the pressure at the turbine exhaust, which maximizes turbine efficiency.
  • Second, the condenser captures valuable condensate for reuse in the Rankine cycle.

An issue in the design of the Rankine cycle power plant is minimizing the losses from the condenser.  This is where feedwater heaters come in.  Feedwater heaters are installed to increase plant efficiency by decreasing heat losses to the condenser.

 

 

Figure 1 – Plant Heat Rate Losses

Figure 2 shows the steam and water cycle for a typical Rankine cycle power plant with seven feedwater heaters (a typical number) installed in the feedwater and condensate flowpaths.  Some of the energy in the steam is converted to mechanical energy in the turbine.  There is still energy in the steam that can be used to heat the feedwater.  This energy bypasses the condenser, thus maintaining this energy in the Rankine Cycle.

Some will say that this is improving efficiency by preheating the feedwater.  Indeed, the feedwater temperature in the example if Figure 2 is increased from 85°F to 508°F during its path through the heaters.  This represents 423°F in temperature that the boiler does NOT need to add to the feedwater, so this does represent an increase in efficiency.

 

 

Figure 2 – Steam and Condensate Cycle with Feedwater Heaters

The real impact on increased system efficiency may be seen by analyzing the thermal energy (enthalpy) that is maintained in the system that would have otherwise been lost to the river or cooling tower.  This energy represents the latent heat of vaporization that is removed from the steam to condense it to liquid water.

  • When a phase transformation occurs from liquid water to steam, the temperature remains constant but there is a great deal of enthalpy added to the water to convert it to 100% steam.
  • Conversely, when the steam is condensed, this large amount of enthalpy is being removed from the steam to convert it to 100% liquid.

When this phase transformation occurs in the condenser this enthalpy is being transferred to the condenser tubes, which discharged the energy to the environment.  However, when the phase transformer occurs in a feedwater heater, the enthalpy stays in the cycle and does not have to be added back in by the boiler.

Additional Articles in this series:

Part 2 of Series: Determining the Health of Feedwater Heaters

Part 3 of Series: Level Control and Feedwater Heater Problems

Scott Hommel
Scott Hommel
Scott Hommel is Vice President and Senior Project Manager at FCS. Following 10 years in the US Navy as an electrician in the Nuclear Power Program, Scott has spent the past 30 years developing procedures and designing and delivering training for the transmission & distribution, and power generation industries. Contact Scott at shommel@fossilconsulting.com for more information or if you have any questions.

Related posts

December 13, 2022

Bridging the Skills Gap: Fixing the staffing problem in power generation.


Read more

power plant worker energy industrial factory inspector expertise

July 25, 2022

The Argument for a Qualification Standard for your Power Plant


Read more
June 13, 2022

Understanding Valve Symbols in FDs and P&IDs


Read more

1 Comment

  1. Mindy Jollie says:
    July 18, 2019 at 3:11 pm

    Thank you for discussing why plants require feedwater heaters. The diagrams are particularly helpful in understanding how these tanks work. If I owned or operated an industrial plant, I would want to make sure all the machinery was working correctly.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Blog Posts

  • 0
    Liquid Glass: The characteristics of Laminar Flow
    January 20, 2023
  • 0
    Hybrid Power Plants
    January 5, 2023
  • 0
    Bridging the Skills Gap: Fixing the staffing problem in power generation.
    December 13, 2022

Fossil Consulting Services, Inc.

6325 Woodside Court, Suite 222
Columbia, Maryland 21046
Telephone: (410) 312-6240
Email: FCS@FossilConsulting.com

NEW FCS Logo_White
© 2022 Fossil Consulting Services, Inc. All Rights Reserved.