25th Anniversary Logo with extra white space25th Anniversary Logo with extra white space25th Anniversary Logo with extra white space25th Anniversary Logo with extra white space
  • Home
  • Services
    • Services Overview
    • Technical Training
    • Plant Engineering
    • Technology Transfer
    • Short Course Catalog
  • Industries Served
    • Power Generation
    • District Energy
    • Transmission & Distribution
    • Pulp and Paper
    • Water and Wastewater Treatment
    • Beverage
    • Heavy Industry
  • Who We Are
    • Our Team
    • Experience
    • Careers
  • Blog
  • Contact us
Coal versus Natural Gas
Natural Gas or Coal? Both.
September 5, 2019
Image of power plant documentation with worker in hard hat
Is Inadequate Training Costing you Money?
September 30, 2019
Show all

Strict Compliance to Approved Procedures

Published by Jason Enge at September 12, 2019
Man checking control panels

I am always perplexed when I visit a site that does not enforce strict compliance with approved procedures.

 

From the Physical Plant Operations Handbook:

“Without rules and guidelines, organizations are doomed to failure from their inception. To assure their continuity, religions have their holy books, athletic teams, their playbooks and we have our [Standard Operating Procedures].”

 

So, why wouldn’t an operator feel compelled to use their “playbook” procedures?  

Well, the most common answer I get is: “The procedure doesn’t work.”  

 

Why don’t the approved procedures work? 

“This valve is stuck,” or “This switch is jumpered out because it sticks.”  

 

Maybe this seems like a legitimate excuse not to use the procedure. Except why not write a temporary procedure that addresses the issue and still allows the system to function as intended?  

“Well, trying to get a procedure changed takes too long – it’s too hard – I can make the system work now if I just…”

 

The trouble with an operator/shift creating an impromptu procedure is that the next operator/shift will likely have to deal with the system in an unknown condition. When equipment is operating without the knowledge or consent of the operator, the equipment is, by definition, operating out of control (Howlett II, 1996).

 

Making Procedural Changes

Only those with a thorough understanding of the effect on the entire plant should make procedural updates, even if it takes longer. 

 

In the Industrial Operator’s Handbook, the author states:

“When correctly developed…system procedures have a lineage that can be traced back to the design basis of the equipment.”  

 

Plants should make changing a procedure easy to avoid the temptation to create field alterations or deviations from in place procedures. If it is easier to cheat than to do something correctly, many will take the easy path resulting in potentially disastrous incidents.

 

One of the root causes of incidents is procedural violations. Frequently, several innocuous workarounds (i.e., field modifications to procedures) compound to form accidents. Therefore, managers should emphasize to operators that their immediate actions are based on a properly functioning system in a known condition. If operators make field alterations to equipment or procedures, their efforts may not be able to place the plant into a safe condition.

 

The benefits multiply for the manager if a simple, clear path to updating procedures exists: 

  1. Operators are likely to use approved procedures.
  2. Problems with equipment are identified and reported early as the procedure modification is requested vice a “field workaround” being devised.
  3. Management is routinely notified of problems that might otherwise be a “workaround.”
  4. The effect of a system or the plant will not be in an unknown.

Previously Generated Blogs:
Condensate-Induced Water Hammer
Watchstanding Principles
Oilers Used for Prevention of Surface Corrosion
Better Maintenance Qualifications & Procedures

Share
Tweet
Share
Pin
Jason Enge
Jason Enge
Jason Enge is a Project Manager and licensed First Grade Engineer who has been with FCS for five years. Additionally, he holds a BS in Business Management. Previously, Jason spent 20 years as a nuclear power plant operator/mechanic and lead trainer in the US Navy, including a tour at the US Naval Academy. He specializes in operation and maintenance of steam plants, water treatment plants and industrial heating and chiller plants. As one of FCS’ lead trainers, he has authored and instructed courses on several types of plants and environmental controls systems.

Related posts

January 14, 2021

Watchstanding Principles – As featured in Power Magazine


Read more
Ice Safety Diagram
January 6, 2021

Induced Draft Cooling Tower Cold Weather Operations


Read more
Two Oil and Gas Workers in front of Combined Cycle Plant piping
September 17, 2020

Challenges Facing the Power Industry


Read more

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Categories

  • Maintenance
  • Operations
  • Power Plant Fundamentals
  • Power Plant Simulation
  • Qualifications and Training
  • Regulations
  • Safety
  • Uncategorized

Recent Posts

  • 0
    Let’s Talk Energy
    April 7, 2021
  • 0
    Energy Storage on the Electric Grid
    March 19, 2021
  • 0
    Water Chemistry: Beans, Beer, and Boilers
    March 12, 2021

Recent Blog Posts

  • 0
    Let’s Talk Energy
    April 7, 2021
  • 0
    Energy Storage on the Electric Grid
    March 19, 2021
  • 0
    Water Chemistry: Beans, Beer, and Boilers
    March 12, 2021

Fossil Consulting Services, Inc.

5457 Twin Knolls Road, Suite 304
Columbia, Maryland 21045
Telephone: (410) 312-6240
Email: FCS@FossilConsulting.com

White FCS Logo with shadow
© 2020 Fossil Consulting Services, Inc. All Rights Reserved.